<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for darkblog resonate</title>
	<link>http://www.darknote.org</link>
	<description>thoughts of a darknote nature</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on the evolution of advertising by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/16/the-evolution-of-advertising/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/16/the-evolution-of-advertising/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Your blog is interesting! 
 
Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog is interesting! </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the evolution of advertising by Recent URLs tagged Immersion - Urlrecorder</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/16/the-evolution-of-advertising/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent URLs tagged Immersion - Urlrecorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/16/the-evolution-of-advertising/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>[...] Recent public urls tagged "immersion"  &#8594; the evolution of advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Recent public urls tagged &#8220;immersion&#8221;  &rarr; the evolution of advertising [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who by Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who at A Better Half</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who at A Better Half</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-332</guid>
		<description>[...] Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who Half a year ago, when Voyage of the Damned aired, fans knew that Kylie Minogue’s role as the Doctor’s companion was for the Christmas special only. So the moment the Doctor smiled his Doctor smile and agreed to let Astrid travel with &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who Half a year ago, when Voyage of the Damned aired, fans knew that Kylie Minogue’s role as the Doctor’s companion was for the Christmas special only. So the moment the Doctor smiled his Doctor smile and agreed to let Astrid travel with &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on replacing the electoral college by darknote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/04/09/replacing-the-electoral-college/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>darknote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/04/09/replacing-the-electoral-college/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>fair enough.  and yes, it's a very idealistic sort of idea to have, an avenue to vent my frustrations at what i feel needs to be changed.  fun to think about. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fair enough.  and yes, it&#8217;s a very idealistic sort of idea to have, an avenue to vent my frustrations at what i feel needs to be changed.  fun to think about. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on crooked windows by kaocrat</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/03/31/crooked-windows/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>kaocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/03/31/crooked-windows/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>I like your crooked computer desktop idea. I'd probably use it if there were such a thing. I think the big obstacle is the way pixels are distributed on a screen, though: diagonals tend to look jagged and fonts get distorted because they're optimized for a specific kind of pixel arrangement, so if you had tilted windows it would be harder to read and you'd need to use larger characters to make up for it, at which point you can't fit as much information on screen at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your crooked computer desktop idea. I&#8217;d probably use it if there were such a thing. I think the big obstacle is the way pixels are distributed on a screen, though: diagonals tend to look jagged and fonts get distorted because they&#8217;re optimized for a specific kind of pixel arrangement, so if you had tilted windows it would be harder to read and you&#8217;d need to use larger characters to make up for it, at which point you can&#8217;t fit as much information on screen at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on replacing the electoral college by kaocrat</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/04/09/replacing-the-electoral-college/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>kaocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/04/09/replacing-the-electoral-college/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>"there’d have to be some guidelines. it can’t just be an isolated measure of intelligence or practical things or awareness of social issues - placing too much emphasis on any of those things individually would influence the presidency too heavily. a balance needs to be struck, determined and governed by a well-picked council."

At that point the testing guidelines become more important than voting, and the "well-picked council" inherits the power imbalance currently occupied by the electoral college. And that's without even getting into *who* will get to pick these council members. You idea is superficially appealing, but it doesn't have anything to do with Democracy, less so even than the system we have now.

Also, we tried the whole "3/5ths of a person" thing a while back, - didn't work out so well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there’d have to be some guidelines. it can’t just be an isolated measure of intelligence or practical things or awareness of social issues - placing too much emphasis on any of those things individually would influence the presidency too heavily. a balance needs to be struck, determined and governed by a well-picked council.&#8221;</p>
<p>At that point the testing guidelines become more important than voting, and the &#8220;well-picked council&#8221; inherits the power imbalance currently occupied by the electoral college. And that&#8217;s without even getting into *who* will get to pick these council members. You idea is superficially appealing, but it doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with Democracy, less so even than the system we have now.</p>
<p>Also, we tried the whole &#8220;3/5ths of a person&#8221; thing a while back, - didn&#8217;t work out so well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on a different music video game concept by Belgand</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/03/15/a-different-music-video-game-concept/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Belgand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/03/15/a-different-music-video-game-concept/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>While interesting and relevant I'm not certain how I feel about the implementation. I don't necessarily think that, for instance, the beat for everyone else should slow. You should, instead, be making them go off-beat and screwing up the song. Once you change that the challenge is one of "play in tempo with each other" rather than "play correctly within the correct tempo of the song".

Perhaps a better solution is to give different levels of correctness. Especially for drums and bass. If I hit the note slightly off then it still sounds, but over time I'll be subtly throwing everyone else off because their note charts aren't adjusting. If I'm too far off though, the usual happens, the note is flubbed, and it doesn't play.

This should work. I mean, who plays Rock Band/Guitar Hero based on sight reading alone? When you play bass you listen to the drums to get the rhythm and match that to your own internal rhythm to keep the groove going and lock-in together. When you're playing guitar you need to listen to your rhythm section, feel the on and off beats with the bass drum, get the eighths from the hi-hat. Feel the momentum and drive of the bass to define the rhythmic feel of the song. If you allow a certain level of incorrectness to be shown by the players as opposed to just keeping their part playing as long as they make it close enough I think it'll help to replicate this as closely as you can until it starts to move too far away from the core concept. Still... if you want to offer something else allowing it, say, some sort of jam mode (change out different instruments for different sounds... no real way to simulate, say, fretting A on the E string for a fatter sound instead of playing it open) or something... that could be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While interesting and relevant I&#8217;m not certain how I feel about the implementation. I don&#8217;t necessarily think that, for instance, the beat for everyone else should slow. You should, instead, be making them go off-beat and screwing up the song. Once you change that the challenge is one of &#8220;play in tempo with each other&#8221; rather than &#8220;play correctly within the correct tempo of the song&#8221;.</p>
<p>Perhaps a better solution is to give different levels of correctness. Especially for drums and bass. If I hit the note slightly off then it still sounds, but over time I&#8217;ll be subtly throwing everyone else off because their note charts aren&#8217;t adjusting. If I&#8217;m too far off though, the usual happens, the note is flubbed, and it doesn&#8217;t play.</p>
<p>This should work. I mean, who plays Rock Band/Guitar Hero based on sight reading alone? When you play bass you listen to the drums to get the rhythm and match that to your own internal rhythm to keep the groove going and lock-in together. When you&#8217;re playing guitar you need to listen to your rhythm section, feel the on and off beats with the bass drum, get the eighths from the hi-hat. Feel the momentum and drive of the bass to define the rhythmic feel of the song. If you allow a certain level of incorrectness to be shown by the players as opposed to just keeping their part playing as long as they make it close enough I think it&#8217;ll help to replicate this as closely as you can until it starts to move too far away from the core concept. Still&#8230; if you want to offer something else allowing it, say, some sort of jam mode (change out different instruments for different sounds&#8230; no real way to simulate, say, fretting A on the E string for a fatter sound instead of playing it open) or something&#8230; that could be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who by darknote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>darknote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>i agree that mickey went through a lot of change, and that change was awesome.  I was speaking more about change from series two to series four.  It was awesome to see him again, but he (along with the others) didn't contribute much to the new story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree that mickey went through a lot of change, and that change was awesome.  I was speaking more about change from series two to series four.  It was awesome to see him again, but he (along with the others) didn&#8217;t contribute much to the new story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who by Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>That was a well-thought-out post--thank you for writing it. I agree with almost everything you said, especially why Donna's ending was just wrong. The only (minor) quibble I have is that Mickey did change, even without the "benefit" of being around the Doctor--he goes from being a shallow, clingy wuss to being a badass in Pete!World. That was good to know, even if we didn't see most of it.

Maybe Mickey is the exception that proves the rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a well-thought-out post&#8211;thank you for writing it. I agree with almost everything you said, especially why Donna&#8217;s ending was just wrong. The only (minor) quibble I have is that Mickey did change, even without the &#8220;benefit&#8221; of being around the Doctor&#8211;he goes from being a shallow, clingy wuss to being a badass in Pete!World. That was good to know, even if we didn&#8217;t see most of it.</p>
<p>Maybe Mickey is the exception that proves the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doctor/companion dynamic in New Who by tamburlaine</title>
		<link>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>tamburlaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.darknote.org/2008/07/07/doctorcompanion-dynamic-in-new-who/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>This is a great little bit of commentary. New Who writes itself into corners, which is sort of funny, considering that with so much time and space to explore... the writers keep running out of plot options. ;)

Borgseawolf is totally right-on with his/her comment. Doctor Who is one of the hugest television shows in England. In America, it's almost impossible to conceive of a television show airing SATURDAY NIGHT getting 9.4 million viewers. 

The reason: RTD has a massive PR machine in his pocket, and he's being coached the whole way as to how to best manipulate the audience to watch his show. Of course you have to do that -- that's entertainment! This all of course led to the viewer response from women 18-39 (notoriously the hardest demographic to get) because of all that romantic blah blah, all the while maintaining the "family friendly" vibe of the show through emphasis on the Doctor's pacifism and his reaction to the relatively benign concept of "death", which in the show is treated as the WORST POSSIBLE THING even if the alternative is much more torturous (see: Donna). Death is scary and mysterious to children, so it seems that someone is whispering in RTD's ear that anything but death can be an acceptable conclusion to a beloved character's storyline. This ending with Donna, however, seems like it would be more confusing and scary than death; the Doctor wiped her memories against her consent and all the positive growth of Donna's character was wiped out in a split second without any catharsis. Yeah, you avoided the PR-forbidden death scene, but Donna's conclusion was so much more macabre. Martha had the most dignified end to her run, and the most pro-female (and I find this show to be incredibly sexist): She CHOSE to leave, and then she went on to be a powerful and successful professional, a "modern woman." That's the kind of thing you want to teach girls.

Frankly, I think all that PR-coaching is rather insulting to the audience because it is so overt. And if anything was a grievous compound insult, it was "Journey's End", which grotesquely exploited both the "anti-death" and "pro-romance" agendas of New Who. Those agendas could have been handled much more subtley, but we had it rammed down our throat, damn the plot continuity and character growth!

One redeeming thing about this finale is the lack of a universal reset button. I hope that in the episodes to come, the Doctor is going to have to deal with knowing he really has reached God Status with humans now. Maybe a right-wing fanatical Doctorist group will be terrorists? HOW TOPICAL! Heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great little bit of commentary. New Who writes itself into corners, which is sort of funny, considering that with so much time and space to explore&#8230; the writers keep running out of plot options. ;)</p>
<p>Borgseawolf is totally right-on with his/her comment. Doctor Who is one of the hugest television shows in England. In America, it&#8217;s almost impossible to conceive of a television show airing SATURDAY NIGHT getting 9.4 million viewers. </p>
<p>The reason: RTD has a massive PR machine in his pocket, and he&#8217;s being coached the whole way as to how to best manipulate the audience to watch his show. Of course you have to do that &#8212; that&#8217;s entertainment! This all of course led to the viewer response from women 18-39 (notoriously the hardest demographic to get) because of all that romantic blah blah, all the while maintaining the &#8220;family friendly&#8221; vibe of the show through emphasis on the Doctor&#8217;s pacifism and his reaction to the relatively benign concept of &#8220;death&#8221;, which in the show is treated as the WORST POSSIBLE THING even if the alternative is much more torturous (see: Donna). Death is scary and mysterious to children, so it seems that someone is whispering in RTD&#8217;s ear that anything but death can be an acceptable conclusion to a beloved character&#8217;s storyline. This ending with Donna, however, seems like it would be more confusing and scary than death; the Doctor wiped her memories against her consent and all the positive growth of Donna&#8217;s character was wiped out in a split second without any catharsis. Yeah, you avoided the PR-forbidden death scene, but Donna&#8217;s conclusion was so much more macabre. Martha had the most dignified end to her run, and the most pro-female (and I find this show to be incredibly sexist): She CHOSE to leave, and then she went on to be a powerful and successful professional, a &#8220;modern woman.&#8221; That&#8217;s the kind of thing you want to teach girls.</p>
<p>Frankly, I think all that PR-coaching is rather insulting to the audience because it is so overt. And if anything was a grievous compound insult, it was &#8220;Journey&#8217;s End&#8221;, which grotesquely exploited both the &#8220;anti-death&#8221; and &#8220;pro-romance&#8221; agendas of New Who. Those agendas could have been handled much more subtley, but we had it rammed down our throat, damn the plot continuity and character growth!</p>
<p>One redeeming thing about this finale is the lack of a universal reset button. I hope that in the episodes to come, the Doctor is going to have to deal with knowing he really has reached God Status with humans now. Maybe a right-wing fanatical Doctorist group will be terrorists? HOW TOPICAL! Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
